[1]田俊松,罗华送,尹帅子.联合冲击疗法治疗腰椎管狭窄症35例临床观察[J].甘肃中医药大学学报,2017,34(01):50-53.[doi:10.16841/j.issn1003-8450.2017.01.16]
 TIAN Junsong,LUO Huasong,YIN Shuaizi.Clinical observation on 35 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis treated by combination pulse therapy[J].Journal of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine,2017,34(01):50-53.[doi:10.16841/j.issn1003-8450.2017.01.16]
点击复制

联合冲击疗法治疗腰椎管狭窄症35例临床观察()
分享到:

《甘肃中医药大学学报》[ISSN:1003-8450/CN:62-1062/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
50-53
栏目:
临床研究与报道
出版日期:
2017-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical observation on 35 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis treated by combination pulse therapy
作者:
田俊松1 罗华送2 尹帅子1
1. 浙江中医药大学第三临床医学院, 浙江 杭州 310053;
2. 杭州市中医院推拿科, 浙江 杭州 310007
Author(s):
TIAN Junsong1 LUO Huasong2 YIN Shuaizi1
1. The Third Clinical Medicine College, Zhejiang University of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310053, China;
2. Massage Department, Hangzhou TCM Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310007, China
关键词:
腰椎管狭窄症联合冲击疗法硬膜外封闭术临床观察
Keywords:
lumbar spinal stenosiscombination pulse therapyextradural blockingclinical observation
分类号:
R274.9
DOI:
10.16841/j.issn1003-8450.2017.01.16
摘要:
目的 观察联合冲击疗法治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法 将70例腰椎管狭窄症患者随机分为对照组和治疗组,各35例。对照组单纯采用针刺、推拿、中医正骨方法治疗;治疗组采用联合冲击疗法治疗。治疗3周后,观察2组的临床疗效及视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分。结果 对照组总有效率为77.2%,治疗组为94.3%,2组比较差异有统计意义(P<0.05);2组治疗后VAS评分均有所下降,且治疗组下降更显著,差异有高度统计意义(P<0.01)。结论 联合冲击疗法较单纯采用传统针刺、推拿、中医正骨方法治疗腰椎管狭窄症临床疗效更显著,值得临床推广。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the efficiency of combination pulse therapy in treating lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods 70 cases were randomized into control group and treatment group,35 cases in each. The control group was treated by acupuncture,massage and bone-setting,while the treatment group was intervened with combination pulse therapy. Clinical effect and VAS score were observed after treatment for 3 weeks. Results The total effective rate in control group was 77.2% while that in treatment group was 94.3%,there was a significant difference (P<0.05).VAS scores of two groups were all decreased while dropped more in treatment group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion The combination therapy is effective and worthwhile for spreading in clinical practice.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王拥军,施杞.腰椎管狭窄症诊断疗效标准[C]//中华中医药学会骨伤分会第四届第二次会议论文汇编.广州:中华中医药学会骨伤分会,2007:7.
[2] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:217.
[3] 丁益群.推拿牵引结合运动治疗腰椎间盘突出症30例[J].南京中医药大学学报,2011,27(4):380-392.
[4] 王启才.针灸治疗学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2003:60.
[5] 杜诚恳,董倔强,王海磊,等.冯氏脊柱定点旋转复位手法治疗急性腰扭伤的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2012,24(9):24-27.
[6] 戚扬颂,加亨,艾恒.硬膜外封闭联合中药治疗腰椎间盘突出症与腰椎管狭窄[J].新疆中医药,2003,21(6):22-23.
[7] 苏建强.硬膜外封闭加推拿手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症105例[J].河北中医,2001,23(7):505-506.
[8] 邓文毅.腰椎间盘突出症手术与保守治疗的近期疗效观察[J].当代医学,2013(30):89-90.
[9] 季伟.非手术疗法治疗腰椎管狭窄研究进展[J].颈腰痛杂志,2013,34(1):72-75.

相似文献/References:

[1]毛伟洪,陈奇红.小针刀配合骶后孔注射及中药内服治疗腰椎管狭窄症60例疗效观察[J].甘肃中医药大学学报,2014,31(04):64.
 Mao Weihong,Chen Qihong.Clinical observation on 60 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis treated with the therapy of small needle-knife combined with posterior sacral foramina injection and Chinese medicine[J].Journal of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine,2014,31(01):64.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-03-17。
作者简介:田俊松(1990-),男,在读硕士研究生。研究方向:推拿治疗脊柱相关性疾病。
通信作者:罗华送(1971-),男,主任医师,副教授,医学学士,主要从事推拿治疗脊柱相关性疾病的研究。E-mail:llsong1971@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01